Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 8:29:00 GMT 1
Means that, in principle, and according to the regulations that public powers must guarantee, every citizen has the right to choose and be elected regardless of sex. , race, language, income or property, profession, social status or class, education, religion or political conviction. Alain Touraine said that the will of the people is the basis of the authority of public power, and if this will is betrayed, democracy is betrayed and the ethical and political legitimacy of whoever acts in this way comes into question. Betraying the meaning of the vote cast by citizens is to pay for the doubt of popular representation since institutional democratic normality is distorted with a political representation that is no longer the one that represents the will of the citizens. For the theory of the quality of democracy, the right to vote is just the starting point; The construction of a democratic regime does not end at the polls; It is, however, the fundamental safe conduct to consolidate an effectively democratic system and a basic piece to put together the puzzle of a regime that prides itself on being so.
Times of citizen disaffection with politics is when the greatness or misery of politics and politicians are best perceived. For Norberto Bobbio, one of the most influential Italian thinkers of the 20th century, a quality or good democracy is one that presents a stable institutional structure that Australia Phone Number makes freedom and equality of citizens possible through the legitimate functioning of its institutions and mechanisms and whose rulers do not act against the will of the citizens who have elected them. Because, according to Bobbio, decent politicians do not act thinking about the next elections, but rather they manage power thinking about the future of the new generations. Betraying the democratic vote is governing in permanent reference according to the geographical location of the voter; Discriminating against citizens based on the votes that a voter provides me if they are from “emptied Spain” or if they live in the “big city”, as Díaz Ayuso does in Madrid, is an indecent calculation and an undemocratic electoral representation bias.
With a critical look at the current reality, and more so, at the parliamentary political reality, no one will find it difficult to perceive the crisis of political representation that we suffer, to which we should add a weakening of citizen interest in politics and politicians and a certain discouragement in democratic participation, whose image is blurred. In times of citizen disaffection with politics and in times of profound transformations, sometimes not understandable and with uncertain results, is when the greatness or misery of politics and politicians are best perceived. The vote in Parliament last Thursday the 11th, on the suitability or not of certain candidates to be on the Constitutional Court, has made many citizens reflect on how the trust of the citizen vote can be betrayed with respect to political parties, on their unfulfilled ethical promises and its democratic deficit. There is a feeling among citizens that ethics and politics work like oil and water: they are incompatible.
Times of citizen disaffection with politics is when the greatness or misery of politics and politicians are best perceived. For Norberto Bobbio, one of the most influential Italian thinkers of the 20th century, a quality or good democracy is one that presents a stable institutional structure that Australia Phone Number makes freedom and equality of citizens possible through the legitimate functioning of its institutions and mechanisms and whose rulers do not act against the will of the citizens who have elected them. Because, according to Bobbio, decent politicians do not act thinking about the next elections, but rather they manage power thinking about the future of the new generations. Betraying the democratic vote is governing in permanent reference according to the geographical location of the voter; Discriminating against citizens based on the votes that a voter provides me if they are from “emptied Spain” or if they live in the “big city”, as Díaz Ayuso does in Madrid, is an indecent calculation and an undemocratic electoral representation bias.
With a critical look at the current reality, and more so, at the parliamentary political reality, no one will find it difficult to perceive the crisis of political representation that we suffer, to which we should add a weakening of citizen interest in politics and politicians and a certain discouragement in democratic participation, whose image is blurred. In times of citizen disaffection with politics and in times of profound transformations, sometimes not understandable and with uncertain results, is when the greatness or misery of politics and politicians are best perceived. The vote in Parliament last Thursday the 11th, on the suitability or not of certain candidates to be on the Constitutional Court, has made many citizens reflect on how the trust of the citizen vote can be betrayed with respect to political parties, on their unfulfilled ethical promises and its democratic deficit. There is a feeling among citizens that ethics and politics work like oil and water: they are incompatible.
