Post by account_disabled on Dec 31, 2023 4:58:04 GMT 1
AProcedure Valer Dorneanu president Marian Enache judge Petre Lzroiu judge Mircea tefan Minea judge Daniel Marius Morar judge MonaMaria Pivniceru judge Livia Doina Stanciu judge SimonaMaya Teodoroiu judge Varga Attila judge Mihaela Senia Costinescu assistant magistrate chief With the participation of the representative of the Public Ministry prosecutor Stefania Sofronea. . The resolution of the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. para. of the Code of Civil Procedure exception raised by Arus Zsolt Istvn in File no. of the Harghita Court Civil Section in a case with the object of ascertaining the nonexecution of a court decision.
The exception of unconstitutionality forms the object of the Constitutional Country Email List Court File no. D. . At the roll call the absence of the parties is noted for which the summoning procedure was legally fulfilled. . president grants the floor to the representative of the Public Ministry who puts forward conclusions rejecting the exception of unconstitutionality as unfounded showing that the criticized procedural norms respect the principle of equal rights of citizens. In this sense he invokes the Decision of the Constitutional Court no. of May . COURT considering the documents and works of the file states the following . By the conclusion of March pronounced in the.
Council Chamber in File no. Harghita Court The civil section notified the Constitutional Court with the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. para. of the Civil Procedure Code. The exception was raised by rus Zsolt Istvn plaintiff in a case with the object of ascertaining the nonexecution of a court decision by the Prefect of Harghita County and obliging him to pay the fine provided by art. para. from Law no. and some compensations. . in justifying the exception of unconstitutionality the author shows that in the case referred to the substantive trial.
The exception of unconstitutionality forms the object of the Constitutional Country Email List Court File no. D. . At the roll call the absence of the parties is noted for which the summoning procedure was legally fulfilled. . president grants the floor to the representative of the Public Ministry who puts forward conclusions rejecting the exception of unconstitutionality as unfounded showing that the criticized procedural norms respect the principle of equal rights of citizens. In this sense he invokes the Decision of the Constitutional Court no. of May . COURT considering the documents and works of the file states the following . By the conclusion of March pronounced in the.
Council Chamber in File no. Harghita Court The civil section notified the Constitutional Court with the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. para. of the Civil Procedure Code. The exception was raised by rus Zsolt Istvn plaintiff in a case with the object of ascertaining the nonexecution of a court decision by the Prefect of Harghita County and obliging him to pay the fine provided by art. para. from Law no. and some compensations. . in justifying the exception of unconstitutionality the author shows that in the case referred to the substantive trial.
